Because Rolling Stone has no agenda at all:
This week in the news: People under 30 can't tell the difference between reality and fiction and are very easily manipulated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- american apparel (4)
- barack obama (104)
- bill clinton (4)
- caucuses (1)
- cavalli for h and m (17)
- communist (1)
- cosmetic (7)
- cult of personality (1)
- deals (2)
- election 2008 (77)
- election 2012 (10)
- elections 2010 (3)
- fun (2)
- h and m (3)
- hello (1)
- hillary clinton (33)
- kirsten gillibrand (1)
- media (2)
- media bias (7)
- Mike Bloomberg (6)
- pets (1)
- political payoffs (2)
- politics (11)
- puma (1)
- race card (1)
- sarah palin (3)
- shopping (8)
- smears by O (7)
- take action (11)
- tech (1)
- the gushing gulf (1)
- the hotness (1)
- the planet (6)
- the sadness (1)
Check 'em out
- Clinton Global Initiatve
- Daily Puma Posts!
- Deadenders
- Democrats Against Obama
- Department of Homegirl Security
- Donate to the Natural Resources Defense Council
- Done dems is now The Examiner. : )
- HillBuzz
- Katalusis
- Not Your Sweetie
- Obama plays race card, blames Clinton
- Project Vote Smart
- Puma Pac
- Rabble Rouser
- Real Clear Politics
- Sec'y of State website
- Women State
2 comments:
Are you under the impression that Rolling Stone has ever tried to hide the fact that it's a liberal magazine? This is like saying Fox News *obviously* has an agenda too.
Duh.
I'm saying that people shouldn't take the article seriously. Same way many of us don't take fox seriously.
Post a Comment